Test — Test Studio
SIT Cycle 2 in progress • Go-Live: 247 days
Go-Live Readiness
67/100
Target: 85 by UAT start
Test Cases
1,247
892 auto-generated by AI
SIT Pass Rate
76%
948 of 1,247 passed
Open Defects
89
12 critical
Test Suite Results — SIT Cycle 2
| Module | Total | Passed | Failed | Blocked | Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Finance (FI/CO) | 342 | 298 | 38 | 6 | 87% |
| Materials (MM) | 267 | 221 | 34 | 12 | 83% |
| Sales (SD) | 198 | 164 | 28 | 6 | 83% |
| Production (PP) | 234 | 147 | 72 | 15 | 63% |
| Quality (QM) | 124 | 82 | 31 | 11 | 66% |
| Plant Maint (PM) | 82 | 36 | 24 | 22 | 44% |
Defect Intelligence
PP module at 63% pass rate. Root cause analysis: 48 of 72 failures trace back to BOM explosion logic in
ZPP_BOM_STEEL. This object is flagged “Dev Review” in Code Studio (38% AI confidence). Recommend: prioritize manual remediation of this object before SIT Cycle 3.PM module has 22 blocked tests. Blocked by missing master data — equipment records not migrated for Durgapur and Rourkela plants. Data migration team needs to load PM master data before PM testing can resume.
Defect curve not flattening. Based on 34 comparable EY projects, the current defect discovery rate suggests UAT will require an additional cycle. Probability of needing extra UAT: 72%.
TOP 3 RECURRING DEFECT PATTERNS
Posting period not open for Universal JournalFI 14x
Steel grade classification missing in QMQM 11x
BOM level explosion timeout for complex assembliesPP 9x